Park Lane works completed

The works and road closure in Park Lane Seal have been completed well ahead of schedule. 

The contractor had completed the works by late on Monday (the first day) and so the road was already open throughout yesterday - which is why there seemed to be no evidence of the closure by late afternoon. 

The original closure was scheduled for up to five days. Given the difficulty of alternative routes when Park Lane is closed, it is good that the contractor was able to allocate extra resource to the works and so minimise the disruption to residents and to the wider road network.

Better Children’s Services: the Education Select Committee

This is going back a few days (it’s been a busy week); on Tuesday I gave evidence to the House of Commons Education Select Committee on aspects of the government’s Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill. I was there in my role as Children’s Services spokesperson for the County Councils Network (CCN), although I also made reference to experiences in Kent, and was alongside representatives from the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), the National Network for the Education of Care Leavers and the charity Kinship.

This was to some degree a repeat of the evidence that I gave to the same Committee (albeit with entirely different membership) in March last year. As before, this covered the problems of cost and service availability in children’s services. This was the subject of the well-regarded Independent Review of Children’s Social Care, chaired by Josh MacAlister (now a Labour MP), followed by a White Paper and a number of initiatives under the previous government. The difference this time is that there is now legislation under consideration, and that the evidence session focused on the Bill’s provisions in relation to management of the market, the development of Regional Care Cooperatives, kinship care, the expanding role of Virtual Schools and care leavers.

While I am critical of some of the education provisions of the Bill (some of which the government has had to row back on), the approach to children’s services is sensible and a welcome example of continuity between governments and across parties. In particular, the problems in the provision of children’s social care (highlighted in a report by the CMA some years ago) are best addressed through strengthening local authority commissioning and increasing the supply of places, as argued in a report (The Way We Care) commissioned by CCN last year. The bill gives the Secretary of State powers to introduce a profit cap, but it is very much a reserve power if other measures fail. That is a right and pragmatic approach; a cap now, without the introduction of other measures, could simply reduce the available provision.

At the end of the session, I highlighted “the elephant in the room”: the £2.5 billion in funding that Josh MacAlister highlighted as necessary to deliver the reforms that the Independent Review advocated. The previous government’s White Paper, Stable Homes, Built on Love was well-received but did not commit to this funding. In the autumn budget and subsequent local government financial settlement, the government established a £270 million Children’s Social Care Prevention Grant. I urged that this should be viewed as a down payment on the funding needed to deliver a comprehensive programme of reform.

You can find the evidence session on the parliamentary TV channel here.

Park Lane Seal closure from Monday

The emergency closure of Park Lane Seal next week was announced yesterday. The closure, between the junctions with Blackhall Lane and Bichet Green Road, will start on Monday for up to five days (17-21 February). This is for essential safety works to trees on unregistered land that Kent Highways is undertaking under its statutory duty of care. Because of the width of the carriageway and the height of the trees the road has to be closed in full rather than a single lane.

The closure is permitted between 8am and 5pm for each day but may on occasion be shorter. The road will reopen when the contractors leave the site each evening. In addition, while the work is scheduled for five days, it is hoped to be less; significant contingency for bad weather, break downs and other delays is built in. 

Any closure on a road like Park Lane will be disruptive, but hopefully scheduling this in half term and delivering the works promptly will minimise this.

KCC budget: Fit for tough times

At Kent County Council yesterday we passed the budget for 2025-26. 

The circumstances in which we have set the budget remain difficult. Over the last few years, pressures in adult social care, children’s services and Special Educational Needs (in particular, in relation to transport) have outpaced the growth in our resources.

While we have made a lot of progress in the first two areas in the last eighteen months (SEN transport is now coming in under budget in the later stages of 2024-25), savings in adult social care are proving harder to realise, and our expenditure outside adults’ and children’s services is still set to fall in 2025-26. This is in spite of an increase in council tax of just under 5% (the referendum limit, although unlike some other councils we did not attempt to go beyond that). 

In my remarks to the council I pointed out that, with public spending under pressure, the government leaning towards methods of distributing funding that do not work in Kent’s favour and many major areas of spending unlikely to be reformed in the near future, the situation will remain tough for the foreseeable future. “There is no cavalry coming over the hill. There is only the hill. So, we have to have a budget fit for that stretching environment, setting us up for a number of years, which is what this budget does.” We share these pressures with councils up and down the country.

The budget continues our savings and transformation programmes in core services, delivers the first part of a nearly £20 million savings package in discretionary expenditure and rebuilds our general reserves in recognition of that tough operating environment. Amendments put forward by opposition groups covered just 0.4% of the budget spend, and none were agreed by County Council.

You can find our media release here.

 

Devolution - but NOT for Kent and Medway

The government announced today that a number of areas have been taken forward for the Devolution Priority Programme (DPP) set out in the English Devolution White Paper. Although all of our neighbours who applied - Greater Essex, Sussex & Brighton, Hampshire & Solent, Surrey (in the latter case, a slightly different application) - were accepted on to the programme, Kent and Medway were not.

As I have set out in a number of interviews today, this is a severe setback, leaving Kent as a devolution desert when all our neighbours will benefit from the increased powers, funding and national voice that will be denied to the 1.9 million residents of Kent and Medway. 

It is also an incomprehensible decision with no clear and logical rationale. We are told that it is because Kent and Medway are local authorities of very different size who could not operate together effectively in a mayoral authority. This argument was never made to us before and flies in the face of disparities of size of authorities in areas which have been approved - and existing models elsewhere, such as North Yorkshire and the City of York. 

We will continue to press for a fuller explanation of this decision, and to get the benefits of devolution to the residents we represent as soon as possible.

You can find our media release, and my reaction here.